Train My Employees. Scientific Advisory Council. Sign In. Create an Account. Check Order Status. Find My Certificate. Use my location. Live Chat. Your Cart is Empty. Learn About Our Programs. Explore other programs: Lifeguarding. The phases are carried out carefully or -- in some cases -- intuitively, for example, when planning a very small, straightforward effort. The complexity of the various phases and their duplication throughout the system depend on the scope of the system.
You might also need...
For example, in a large corporation, the following phases would be carried out in the corporate offices, in each division, in each department, in each group, etc. NOTE: Different groups of planners might have different names for the following activities and groups them differently.
However, the nature of the activities and their general sequence remains the same. NOTE: The following are typical phases in planning. They do not comprise the complete, ideal planning process. For example, during strategic planning, it's critical to reference the mission, or overall purpose, of the organization.
This "taking stock" is always done to some extent, whether consciously or unconsciously. For example, during strategic planning, it's important to conduct an environmental scan.
This scan usually involves considering various driving forces, or major influences, that might effect the organization. For example, during strategic planning, planners often conduct a "SWOT analysis". SWOT is an acronym for considering the organization's strengths and weaknesses, and the opportunities and threats faced by the organization.
During this analysis, planners also can use a variety of assessments, or methods to "measure" the health of systems. Based on the analysis and alignment to the overall mission of the system, planners establish a set of goals that build on strengths to take advantage of opportunities, while building up weaknesses and warding off threats.
- Check out all these great features.
- The (p,n) Reaction and the Nucleon-Nucleon Force.
- Strategy and Politics in the Middle East, 1954-1960: Defending the Northern Tier.
- === INTRO TO MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION ===;
The particular strategies or methods to reach the goals chosen depend on matters of affordability, practicality and efficiency. Responsibilities are assigned, including for implementation of the plan, and for achieving various goals and objectives.
Ideally, deadlines are set for meeting each responsibility. The above information is organized and written in a document which is distributed around the system. This step is frequently forgotten, which can lead to increasing frustration and skepticism on the part of those people who are responsible to carry out the plan.
A common failure in many kinds of planning is that the plan is never really implemented. Instead, all focus is on writing a plan document. Too often, the plan sits collecting dust on a shelf. Therefore, most of the following guidelines help to ensure that the planning process is carried out completely and is implemented completely -- or, deviations from the intended plan are recognized and managed accordingly. Going back to the reference to systems, it's critical that all parts of the system continue to exchange feedback in order to function effectively.
This is true no matter what type of system. When planning, get input from everyone who will responsible to carry out parts of the plan, along with representative from groups who will be effected by the plan. Of course, people also should be involved if they will be responsible to review and authorize the plan. New managers, in particular, often forget that others don't know what these managers know.
Even if managers do communicate their intentions and plans verbally, chances are great that others won't completely hear or understand what the manager wants done. Also, as plans change, it's extremely difficult to remember who is supposed to be doing what and according to which version of the plan. Key stakeholders employees, management, board members, funders, investor, customers, clients, etc.
- Manufacturing Engineering & Technology!
- Oxford Users Guide to Mathematics.
- GIMP - Tutorials!
- BASIC - Wikipedia.
- Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences.
Therefore, it's critical to write plans down and communicate them widely. Specific: For example, it's difficult to know what someone should be doing if they are to pursue the goal to "work harder". It's easier to recognize "Write a paper". Measurable: It's difficult to know what the scope of "Writing a paper" really is. It's easier to appreciate that effort if the goal is "Write a page paper".
It’s free! How affordable is that, right!?
Acceptable: If I'm to take responsibility for pursuit of a goal, the goal should be acceptable to me. For example, I'm not likely to follow the directions of someone telling me to write a page paper when I also have to five other papers to write. However, if you involve me in setting the goal so I can change my other commitments or modify the goal, I'm much more likely to accept pursuit of the goal as well. Realistic: Even if I do accept responsibility to pursue a goal that is specific and measurable, the goal won't be useful to me or others if, for example, the goal is to "Write a page paper in the next 10 seconds".
Time frame: It may mean more to others if I commit to a realistic goal to "Write a page paper in one week". However, it'll mean more to others particularly if they are planning to help me or guide me to reach the goal if I specify that I will write one page a day for 30 days, rather than including the possibility that I will write all 30 pages in last day of the day period. Extending: The goal should stretch the performer's capabilities.
For example, I might be more interested in writing a page paper if the topic of the paper or the way that I write it will extend my capabilities. Rewarding: I'm more inclined to write the paper if the paper will contribute to an effort in such a way that I might be rewarded for my effort.
Plans should specify who is responsible for achieving each result, including goals and objectives. Dates should be set for completion of each result, as well. Responsible parties should regularly review status of the plan. Be sure to have someone of authority "sign off" on the plan, including putting their signature on the plan to indicate they agree with and support its contents. Include responsibilities in policies, procedures, job descriptions, performance review processes, etc. It's OK to deviate from the plan. The plan is not a set of rules. It's an overall guideline. As important as following the plan is noticing deviations and adjusting the plan accordingly.
During the planning process, regularly collect feedback from participants. Do they agree with the planning process? If not, what don't they like and how could it be done better?
In large, ongoing planning processes such as strategic planning, business planning, project planning, etc. During regular reviews of implementation of the plan, assess if goals are being achieved or not. If not, were goals realistic? Do responsible parties have the resources necessary to achieve the goals and objectives? Should goals be changed? Should more priority be placed on achieving the goals?source link
Downloads, Manuals & Support – tisolofo.tk
What needs to be done? Finally, take 10 minutes to write down how the planning process could have been done better. File it away and read it the next time you conduct the planning process. Far too often, primary emphasis is placed on the plan document. This is extremely unfortunate because the real treasure of planning is the planning process itself.
During planning, planners learn a great deal from ongoing analysis, reflection, discussion, debates and dialogue around issues and goals in the system. Perhaps there is no better example of misplaced priorities in planning than in business ethics.
Tutorials and Courses for Beginners – Learn WordPress.com
Far too often, people put emphasis on written codes of ethics and codes of conduct. While these documents certainly are important, at least as important is conducting ongoing communications around these documents. The ongoing communications are what sensitize people to understanding and following the values and behaviors suggested in the codes. There are other ways to conduct planning.